bore and stoke of mel lincoln

Discussion of MEL engine related topics only.
ltman
Airman basic
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri 2. Jan 2009, 09:40

bore and stoke of mel lincoln

Post by ltman » Sat 3. Jan 2009, 07:14

What is the Bore and stroke of all the mel motors

User avatar
Theo
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 1184
Joined: Sun 21. Dec 2008, 14:10
Gender: male
Location: Berlin / Potsdam in Germany
Contact:

Re: bore and stoke of mel lincoln

Post by Theo » Sat 3. Jan 2009, 08:29

383 cid engine...........4,30" X 3,30"
410 cid engine...........4,20" X 3,70"
430 cid engine...........4,30" X 3,70"
462 cid engine...........4,38" X 3,83"
Best regards
Theo
Admin

Beep
Airman basic
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon 29. Dec 2008, 07:48

Re: bore and stoke of mel lincoln

Post by Beep » Tue 6. Jan 2009, 07:48

Can a 410 (4.2 bore) be bored to a 430 size (4.3) safely? I have found a NOS set of forged 11.5:1 4.3 standard sized pistons.

User avatar
KULTULZ
Technical Sergeant
Technical Sergeant
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed 12. May 2010, 10:35
Gender: male

MEL ENGINE SPECS 1958/1968

Post by KULTULZ » Wed 7. Jan 2009, 15:47

MEL (MERCURY-EDSEL-LINCOLN) Engine Specifications 1958/1968

383C.I. Bore 4.30” x Stroke 3.30” (1958/59) (MERC)
410C.I. Bore 4.20” x Stroke 3.70” (1958) (EDSEL)
430C.I. Bore 4.30” x Stroke 3.70” (1958/65) (LINC-MERC-TBIRD)
462C.I. Bore 4.38” x Stroke 3.83” (1966/68) (LINC)

1958 MERCURY

383C.I. 4V (Monterey Low-Torque)
312HP @ 4600 RPM CR 10.5 To 1

383C.I. 4V (Montclair Hi-Torque)
330HP @ 4600 RPM CR 10.5 To 1

430C.I. 4V
360HP @ 4600 RPM CR 10.5 To 1

430C.I 6V
400 HP (Super Marauder)

1958 EDSEL

410C.I. 4V (E-475)
345HP @ 4600 RPM CR 10.5 To 1
475 ft.lb. Torque

1958 LINCOLN

430C.I. 4V
375HP @ 4800 RPM CR 10.5 To 1

430C.I. 6V
400HP @4600 RPM

1959 MERCURY

383C.I. 2V
280HP @ 4400 RPM CR 10.0 To 1

383C.I. 4V
322HP @ 4600 RPM CR 10.0 To 1

430C.I. 4V
345HP @ 4400 RPM CR 10.0 To 1

1959 LINCOLN

430C.I. 4V
350HP @ 4400 RPM CR 10.0 To 1

1959 THUNDERBIRD

430C.I. 4V
350HP @ 4400 RPM CR 10.0 To 1

1960 MERCURY

430C.I. 2V
310hp @ 4100 RPM CR 10.0 To 1

1960 LINCOLN

430C.I. 2V
315HP @ 4100 RPM CR 10.0 To 1

1960 THUNDERBIRD

430C.I. 4V
350HP @ 4400 RPM CR 10.2 To 1

1961 LINCOLN

430C.I. 2V
300HP @ 4100 RPM CR 10.0 To 1

1962 LINCOLN

430C.I. 2V
300HP

1963 LINCOLN

430C.I. 4V
320HP @ 4600 RPM CR 10.0 To 1

1964 LINCOLN

430C.I. 4V
320HP

1965 LINCOLN
430C.I. 4V
320HP

1966 LINCOLN

462C.I. 4V
340HP @ 4600 RPM CR 10.25 To 1

1967 LINCOLN

462C.I. 4V
340HP

1968 LINCOLN

462C.I. 4V
340HP

There may be mistakes in some of the ratings. They vary by publication. But this will give an idea of how the engine(s) progressed/digressed.

Source- Standard Catalog of FORD 1903-1998 Edited by Ron Kowalke
____________________________________________

KULTULZ

Re: bore and stoke of mel lincoln

Post by KULTULZ » Wed 7. Jan 2009, 15:54

Beep wrote:
Can a 410 (4.2 bore) be bored to a 430 size (4.3) safely? I have found a NOS set of forged 11.5:1 4.3 standard sized pistons.
I don't know the answer to this question. You would think so as MEL would not have to cast more than one block. There were a few 410 users on the old board. Maybe if you cruise through there you can find an E-Mail for one of them. Having it sonic checked is the only other way I would know.

Ted
Airman
Airman
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat 3. Jan 2009, 16:11
Gender: male
Location: Central Texas
Contact:

Re: bore and stoke of mel lincoln

Post by Ted » Wed 7. Jan 2009, 17:34

Beep wrote:Can a 410 (4.2 bore) be bored to a 430 size (4.3) safely? I have found a NOS set of forged 11.5:1 4.3 standard sized pistons.
Here's a sonic test sheet for a '58 Edsel 410 that was already 0.060" over. It potentially could have been bored out to 4.300" and still had the prerequisite 0.100" minimum remaining. This particular block had a porosity problem in one of the cylinders and was replaced with another block rather than sleeve the questionable cylinder as this engine had a history of other issues also. If core shift is taken into account on a block that's still a standard bore or close, then the cylinders can be offset bored to keep a more uniform cylinder wall thickness.
MEL Sonic Test 385X499.JPG
MEL Sonic Test 385X499.JPG (33.37 KiB) Viewed 4149 times
Ted Eaton. www.eatonbalancing.com
Ted Eaton --- http://www.eatonbalancing.com/ --
Big Engines are quick but it's hard to beat the fun that comes from running a normally aspirated Y-Block at 8.80's and 147 mph in the quarter.

User avatar
KULTULZ
Technical Sergeant
Technical Sergeant
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed 12. May 2010, 10:35
Gender: male

Re: bore and stoke of mel lincoln

Post by KULTULZ » Thu 8. Jan 2009, 02:23

Now that's what I call an informative post... :shock:

THANX TED!

ltman
Airman basic
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri 2. Jan 2009, 09:40

Re: bore and stoke of mel lincoln

Post by ltman » Wed 18. Feb 2009, 17:22

Ted i gess you have bult some bad mels to I no your info will be greatly apreshated over hear

thedsel
Airman basic
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun 28. Dec 2008, 16:56

Re: bore and stoke of mel lincoln

Post by thedsel » Thu 16. Apr 2009, 14:06

Yes, My Citation 410 is now a 430.
Dave

austlinc
Airman basic
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri 26. Dec 2008, 22:56

Re: bore and stoke of mel lincoln

Post by austlinc » Tue 21. Apr 2009, 07:30

Hello guys,

Does anyone know what the conrod lenght and piston pin diameter is for the 430 and the 462?

Also were the 462 created by opening up the bore from 4.30" to 4.38" and using the bigger crank in a 430 block?

Are the 430 and 462 identical besides the piston and crank?

Cheers Angelo

Post Reply

Return to “MEL Engine General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests